<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING NEWS: Ottawa talking to Chicago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/</link>
	<description>An Ottawa Senators Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: In the words of Marv Albert: Yesssss!!!!! &#171; Talk of New York (T.O.N.Y) Sports</title>
		<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>In the words of Marv Albert: Yesssss!!!!! &#171; Talk of New York (T.O.N.Y) Sports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://senshot.com/?p=429#comment-475</guid>
		<description>[...] - Trade winds cometh,  Ottawa talking to Chicago [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Trade winds cometh,  Ottawa talking to Chicago [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackie</title>
		<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://senshot.com/?p=429#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Seabrook is NOT being traded.  Barker yes I can understand, and maybe Campbell if Ottawa is willing to take on his salary.  Seabrook, however, is not going anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seabrook is NOT being traded.  Barker yes I can understand, and maybe Campbell if Ottawa is willing to take on his salary.  Seabrook, however, is not going anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfie</title>
		<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://senshot.com/?p=429#comment-472</guid>
		<description>talking out your ass is funny, im sure senshot has the exclusive lol

get a source</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>talking out your ass is funny, im sure senshot has the exclusive lol</p>
<p>get a source</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CairraiTearlach</title>
		<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>CairraiTearlach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://senshot.com/?p=429#comment-470</guid>
		<description>This doesn&#039;t make sense - the Black Hawks can&#039;t take back salary as they will be at the cap - Ottawa has no real cap space and have to give back players - the Hawks have to deal with someone who can absorb salary and give back draft choices - like Kessel for 2 first round draft picks (which was way too steep a price by the way)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t make sense &#8211; the Black Hawks can&#8217;t take back salary as they will be at the cap &#8211; Ottawa has no real cap space and have to give back players &#8211; the Hawks have to deal with someone who can absorb salary and give back draft choices &#8211; like Kessel for 2 first round draft picks (which was way too steep a price by the way)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franse</title>
		<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>franse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://senshot.com/?p=429#comment-469</guid>
		<description>In your dreams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your dreams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LT</title>
		<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>LT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://senshot.com/?p=429#comment-468</guid>
		<description>The only thing you can bet on is this.  Seabrook is NOT going to be traded.....period</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing you can bet on is this.  Seabrook is NOT going to be traded&#8230;..period</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bartl</title>
		<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bartl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://senshot.com/?p=429#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Do you have a source to back this up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a source to back this up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GelatinousMutantCoconut</title>
		<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>GelatinousMutantCoconut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://senshot.com/?p=429#comment-463</guid>
		<description>Is that enough to get it done though? 

Picard is a solid 3rd pairing guy, with potential to be all-around but makes critical mistakes in the defensive zone. 

Campoli is also a bottom pairing guy, but with the potential to quarterback the powerplay. But that potential is fading. 

Both are cheap, but neither really benefits to Chicago. Yes, they&#039;re cheap, but it&#039;s possible that there are other more effective cheap defenseman that Chicago could use more. 

Ryan Shannon played amazingly last year, and looked like he could be a top-6 forward. His role was reduced this year, and his game hasn&#039;t been the same. It&#039;s possible that given a larger role he could again flourish.  However, I don&#039;t see his trade value being too high.

As much as I would love to have Sharp, our biggest need is at defense, so I hope that Barker is the target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that enough to get it done though? </p>
<p>Picard is a solid 3rd pairing guy, with potential to be all-around but makes critical mistakes in the defensive zone. </p>
<p>Campoli is also a bottom pairing guy, but with the potential to quarterback the powerplay. But that potential is fading. </p>
<p>Both are cheap, but neither really benefits to Chicago. Yes, they&#8217;re cheap, but it&#8217;s possible that there are other more effective cheap defenseman that Chicago could use more. </p>
<p>Ryan Shannon played amazingly last year, and looked like he could be a top-6 forward. His role was reduced this year, and his game hasn&#8217;t been the same. It&#8217;s possible that given a larger role he could again flourish.  However, I don&#8217;t see his trade value being too high.</p>
<p>As much as I would love to have Sharp, our biggest need is at defense, so I hope that Barker is the target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://senshot.com/2009/11/18/breaking-news-ottawa-talking-to-chicago/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://senshot.com/?p=429#comment-461</guid>
		<description>I would like to see Murray get one of Seabrook or Barker I would like to see get Andrew Ladd along with Brent Seabrook or Cam Barker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see Murray get one of Seabrook or Barker I would like to see get Andrew Ladd along with Brent Seabrook or Cam Barker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
